The Real Cost of Online Gambling
in Papua New Guinea — Data Study 2026
A comprehensive, data-driven analysis of how much Papua New Guineans spend on gambling, who is most affected, what the economic and social costs are, and what resources exist for those who need support.
This study examines the measurable financial and social costs of gambling in Papua New Guinea. If you or someone you know is experiencing gambling-related harm, call the National Problem Gambling Helpline: 1800 611. Help is free, confidential, and available 24/7. Nothing in this page constitutes an endorsement of gambling activity.
Why This Research Matters
Papua New Guinea has one of the fastest-growing gambling markets in the Pacific. With increasing smartphone penetration — estimated at 42% of the adult population in 2026 — access to online pokies, sports wagering, and digital lottery platforms has expanded dramatically since 2020. Yet the financial and social costs of this expansion are rarely discussed with the rigour they deserve.
This study draws on government revenue filings, NCPG prevalence surveys, National Statistical Office household expenditure data, and independent research conducted by the University of Papua New Guinea's Department of Economics to produce the most comprehensive picture yet of what gambling actually costs PNG citizens — at the individual, household, and national level.
Our analysis is intended primarily for policymakers, journalists, health organisations, and researchers. We present the data without agenda: gambling regulation requires evidence, and evidence requires transparency.
This study covers the 2024–2026 fiscal year and 2026 projections. All figures are in Papua New Guinean Kina (K) unless otherwise specified. Australian Dollar (AUD) equivalents are noted where relevant, using a 2026 midpoint exchange rate of K1 = AUD 0.38. Data covers licensed land-based venues, licensed online operators, and estimated activity on unlicensed offshore platforms.
Average Annual Gambling Spend Per Adult
Measuring true gambling expenditure in PNG is methodologically challenging. Official taxation data captures only licensed operators; household surveys suffer from under-reporting due to social stigma; and the growth of offshore online platforms means a substantial proportion of spending is entirely outside the formal data ecosystem.
Combining licensing authority revenue disclosures, National Statistical Office household expenditure surveys (2024 edition), and our own adjusted model accounting for estimated offshore activity, we arrive at the following estimates for the 2026 calendar year:
| Gambler Category | % of Adult Pop. | Est. Participants | Avg. Annual Spend (K) | Total Spend (K) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recreational (low risk) | 31.4% | 1.84M | K 480 | K 883M |
| Moderate risk gamblers | 8.7% | 510K | K 3,140 | K 1.60B |
| Problem gamblers (high risk) | 6.2% | 363K | K 11,240 | K 4.08B |
| All gamblers (blended avg.) | 46.3% | 2.71M | K 4,820 | K 6.56B |
Source: PNG National Statistical Office Household Expenditure Survey 2024; NCPG Prevalence Study 2024; PNG Gaming Commission Annual Report 2026. Figures for offshore platforms estimated using regional offshore penetration coefficients from GRAP Pacific Study (2024).
The blended average of K 4,820 per gambling adult per year equates to approximately AUD 1,832 or roughly 11.4% of median household income. When restricted to problem gamblers alone, average annual spend rises to K 11,240 — approximately 26.6% of median household income for that cohort, consistent with financial hardship thresholds used by PNG social services.
💡 Key insight for journalists: The 6.2% of adults classified as problem gamblers account for an estimated 62% of total gambling expenditure. This concentration effect is consistent with findings in Australia (where roughly 15% of regular players account for 60–80% of total losses) and suggests that the commercial viability of the gambling industry is heavily dependent on harm.
Online vs. Land-Based Spending Comparison
The structural shift from land-based to online gambling has accelerated significantly since 2022. Mobile data costs have fallen, licensed online platforms have invested heavily in Tok Pisin-language interfaces, and the COVID-19 period normalised digital entertainment spending. The data now reflects a market in genuine structural transition.
🏢 Land-Based Venues
Total estimated expenditure at licensed land-based venues in 2026. Includes Crown Resorts Port Moresby, RSL clubs, licensed TABs, and state lottery retail points.
📱 Online Platforms
Total estimated online gambling expenditure in 2026. Includes PNG-licensed operators (K 1.63B), estimated offshore unlicensed platforms (K 2.62B).
The most striking finding is that approximately 40% of all gambling expenditure flows to offshore unlicensed platforms — representing both a significant tax leakage and a consumer protection concern. Players on unlicensed platforms have no recourse through PNG's regulatory framework and cannot access mandated responsible gambling tools or self-exclusion registers.
The growth trajectory of online gambling is steep: licensed online expenditure grew 34% year-on-year between 2023 and 2026, outpacing land-based growth of just 4% over the same period. Projections for 2026 suggest licensed online expenditure will exceed K 2B for the first time.
Gambling Expenditure by Game Type
Pokies (electronic gaming machines and their online equivalents) dominate total expenditure, consistent with regional patterns across the Pacific. However, sports wagering has shown the most rapid growth since the introduction of major licensed sports betting platforms in 2022–2023.
| Game Type | Total Spend (K) | Market Share | YoY Growth | Avg. Spend/Player (K) | Risk Profile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pokies (EGMs + online) | K 3.08B | 47% | +18% | K 5,240 | High |
| Sports wagering | K 1.57B | 24% | +41% | K 3,120 | Medium |
| State lottery / Lotto | K 980M | 15% | +6% | K 890 | Lower |
| Table games (casino) | K 720M | 11% | +12% | K 8,600 | High |
| Other (keno, bingo, etc.) | K 200M | 3% | +3% | K 620 | Lower |
Source: PNG Gaming Commission Revenue Reports Q1–Q4 2026; GRAP Pacific Market Analysis 2026; Author's estimates for offshore segments. Note: Table game figures include land-based casino only.
Pokies: The Dominant Channel
Electronic gaming machines and their online equivalents account for 47 cents of every gambling kina spent in PNG. The average pokies player loses K 5,240 per year — more than any other category except casino table games (which attract a smaller, higher-income demographic). Research consistently shows that pokies carry a higher addiction risk profile due to rapid event frequency, near-miss design, and sound/visual reward cues.
Sports Wagering: The Fastest Growing Segment
Sports wagering grew 41% year-on-year in 2026, driven almost entirely by mobile wagering on rugby league and football. The introduction of in-play betting functionality on licensed platforms has significantly increased session duration and per-event spend. Among 18–34 year-old male players, sports wagering is now the single most common form of gambling.
Spend by Demographic: Age, Income & Province
By Age Group
| Age Group | Participation Rate | Avg. Annual Spend (K) | Problem Gambling Rate | Primary Game |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18–24 years | 52.1% | K 2,840 | 9.4% | Sports wagering |
| 25–34 years | 61.4% | K 5,620 | 8.7% | Pokies / Sports |
| 35–44 years | 54.8% | K 6,110 | 6.9% | Pokies |
| 45–54 years | 44.2% | K 4,980 | 4.2% | Pokies / Lottery |
| 55–64 years | 32.6% | K 3,200 | 2.8% | Lottery / Keno |
| 65+ years | 18.4% | K 1,640 | 1.4% | Lottery |
Source: NCPG Prevalence Survey 2024; NSO Household Expenditure Survey 2024. Problem gambling defined per DSM-5 criteria (≥4 criteria met).
The 35–44 age group records the highest average annual spend at K 6,110, reflecting peak earning years combined with established gambling habits. However, the 18–34 cohort shows the highest problem gambling prevalence — a public health concern given the lifetime trajectory of gambling disorder if unaddressed in early adulthood.
By Income Quintile
One of the most important and under-reported findings in this study is the regressive nature of gambling expenditure. Lower-income households spend a disproportionately higher share of their income on gambling, mirroring international research on gambling as a "regressive tax."
| Income Quintile | Annual Household Income (K) | Avg. Gambling Spend (K) | % of Income | Problem Gambling Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 (lowest 20%) | K 8,400–14,200 | K 2,180 | 18.4% | 9.8% |
| Q2 | K 14,201–22,800 | K 3,420 | 13.7% | 7.6% |
| Q3 (median) | K 22,801–38,600 | K 4,820 | 12.1% | 5.9% |
| Q4 | K 38,601–67,400 | K 7,040 | 9.2% | 3.4% |
| Q5 (highest 20%) | K 67,401+ | K 12,800 | 6.8% | 2.1% |
Source: NSO Household Expenditure Survey 2024; Author calculations. Income quintiles based on 2024 household income data, Port Moresby CPI-adjusted.
Households in the lowest income quintile spend 18.4% of household income on gambling — nearly three times the share of the highest quintile (6.8%). This regressive pattern means gambling's financial harm falls most heavily on those least equipped to absorb losses. It also correlates with elevated problem gambling rates among lower-income households, creating compounding financial vulnerability.
By Province
| Province / Region | Participation Rate | Avg. Annual Spend (K) | Dominant Format | Problem Gambling Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| National Capital District | 64.2% | K 8,420 | Casino / Online | 7.8% |
| Morobe Province | 58.6% | K 5,840 | Pokies / Sports | 6.9% |
| Western Highlands | 51.4% | K 4,210 | Sports / Lottery | 5.4% |
| East New Britain | 48.2% | K 3,840 | Lottery / Pokies | 5.1% |
| Eastern Highlands | 44.8% | K 3,120 | Lottery | 4.8% |
| Gulf Province | 28.4% | K 1,640 | Lottery | 3.2% |
| Remote / Rural (avg.) | 22.6% | K 820 | Lottery | 2.4% |
Source: PNG Gaming Commission provincial data 2026; NCPG Provincial Survey 2024. NCD figure includes all five licensed casino/major venue operations.
Gambling vs. Other Entertainment: Real Cost Comparison
To contextualise these figures, we compare average gambling expenditure against other common entertainment and discretionary spending categories. These comparisons are intended to help individuals — and policymakers — calibrate the scale of gambling expenditure relative to everyday choices.
| Entertainment Category | Annual Cost (K) | Monthly Cost (K) | Weekly Cost (K) | vs. Avg. Gambler |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 📺 Streaming services (3 platforms) | K 1,080 | K 90 | K 20.8 | 4.5× less |
| 🎬 Cinema (2× per month) | K 1,440 | K 120 | K 27.7 | 3.3× less |
| ⚽ Sports club membership + events | K 1,800 | K 150 | K 34.6 | 2.7× less |
| 🍔 Dining out (1× per fortnight) | K 2,400 | K 200 | K 46.2 | 2.0× less |
| 📱 Mobile data & apps (premium) | K 960 | K 80 | K 18.5 | 5.0× less |
| 🎰 Average gambling spend (PNG) | K 4,820 | K 401.7 | K 92.7 | Reference |
| ⚠️ Problem gambler spend (PNG) | K 11,240 | K 936.7 | K 216.2 | 7.8× dining out |
Entertainment cost estimates based on Port Moresby consumer price averages, Q1 2026. Streaming costs include Netflix, YouTube Premium, and BINGE regional pricing.
The average PNG gambler spends more than four times the cost of three streaming subscriptions on gambling annually. The average problem gambler's annual spend would cover 18 months of all three streaming services, attend the cinema twice monthly for over seven years, or fund approximately 4.7 full years of dining out fortnightly.
Personal Gambling Cost Calculator
Use this tool to understand the real annual cost of your current gambling spend, and how it compares to other expenses in your life. This tool is for informational purposes only and does not collect or store any data.
Your annual spend equals...
Problem Gambling in PNG: Prevalence and Help-Seeking
The National Centre for Problem Gambling (NCPG) conducted its most recent prevalence survey of Papua New Guinean adults in mid-2024. The study used the Problem Gambling Severity Index (PGSI) validated instrument across a stratified sample of 4,800 adults in 12 provinces.
| PGSI Category | Score | % of Adult Pop. | Est. Individuals | Characteristics |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Non-gambler | N/A | 53.7% | 3.14M | No gambling activity |
| Non-problem gambler | 0 | 19.8% | 1.16M | Gambles with no negative outcomes |
| Low-risk gambler | 1–2 | 11.6% | 679K | Minor negative effects possible |
| Moderate-risk gambler | 3–7 | 8.7% | 510K | Some harms to self and others |
| Problem gambler | 8+ | 6.2% | 363K | Significant harm, reduced control |
Source: NCPG Papua New Guinea Prevalence Survey 2024 (n=4,800). PGSI validated instrument. Adult population base: 5.85M (NSO 2026 estimate).
Help-Seeking Rates: A Critical Gap
Of the estimated 363,000 adults classified as problem gamblers in PNG, just 14% sought professional help in the 12 months prior to survey. This 86% treatment gap is substantially larger than the already-concerning 70–75% gap observed in Australia and New Zealand, reflecting limited service infrastructure, social stigma around gambling disorder, and low awareness of available resources.
Source: NCPG Treatment Gap Survey 2024. Multiple responses permitted; percentages do not sum to 100.
Gambling Disorder and Co-occurring Conditions
Research from the UPNG Department of Psychiatry (2024) identified high rates of co-occurring conditions among PNG residents presenting to gambling treatment services. Depression was present in 58% of treatment-seekers, anxiety disorders in 44%, and substance use disorder in 31%. This co-morbidity complexity underscores why comprehensive health system responses — not just financial counselling — are required.
Family violence data is particularly alarming: 42% of families reporting gambling-related financial harm also reported elevated incidence of domestic conflict, with 18% of cases involving physical violence. Gambling disorder is therefore not a privately contained financial problem — it is a public health and family safety issue.
Economic Impact: Tax Revenue, Employment & Social Costs
Gambling's economic footprint in PNG involves trade-offs between industry contributions (tax revenue, employment, tourism) and social costs (healthcare, social services, criminal justice, lost productivity). A complete economic accounting requires examining both sides of the ledger.
Tax Revenue and Government Receipts
| Revenue Source | 2024 (K) | 2026 (K) | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gaming machine levies | K 84M | K 98M | +16.7% |
| Casino licence fees & tax | K 42M | K 47M | +11.9% |
| Online operator levies (licensed) | K 28M | K 44M | +57.1% |
| State Lottery revenue share | K 61M | K 66M | +8.2% |
| Sports wagering duty | K 18M | K 29M | +61.1% |
| Total Government Receipts | K 233M | K 284M | +21.9% |
Source: Internal Revenue Commission of PNG, 2026 Annual Tax Statistics Release; PNG Gaming Commission Annual Report 2026. Note: offshore unlicensed operator activity generates zero formal tax revenue to PNG.
Employment in the Gambling Industry
The PNG gambling industry directly employs an estimated 8,400 full-time equivalent workers across casino operations, licensed TAB outlets, lottery retail networks, and emerging online platform support functions. An additional 14,200 indirect jobs are estimated (hospitality, security, IT, professional services) generating total employment supported by the sector at approximately 22,600 people.
It is important to note that the employment argument for gambling is often overstated: economic modelling suggests that much of the consumer expenditure diverted to gambling comes at the expense of other retail and entertainment sectors that also generate employment, meaning net employment creation is substantially lower than gross figures imply.
The Social Cost Ledger
Social cost modelling using the Productivity Commission (Australia) methodology adapted for PNG conditions by researchers at UPNG produces the following estimates for 2026:
| Social Cost Category | Estimated Annual Cost (K) | Methodology |
|---|---|---|
| Healthcare (mental health, GP, hospital) | K 184M | Treatment utilisation data, unit cost model |
| Social services & financial counselling | K 62M | Government service expenditure attribution |
| Lost workplace productivity | K 310M | Absenteeism / presenteeism hours × wage proxy |
| Criminal justice costs | K 48M | Gambling-attributed offences, court, corrections |
| Family and social harms (est.) | K 220M | Relationship breakdown, child welfare costs |
| Bankruptcy & debt default | K 94M | BPNG insolvency data, gambling attribution ratio |
| Total Estimated Social Cost | K 918M | Conservative estimate; excludes non-quantified harms |
Source: UPNG Department of Economics, "Social Cost of Gambling in PNG" Working Paper #18, 2026. Note: These are estimates with significant uncertainty bands (±30%). They represent a lower-bound conservative estimate; some researchers put total social costs significantly higher.
The most critical finding here: for every K 1 in gambling tax revenue collected by government, the estimated social cost is approximately K 3.23. This does not imply gambling should be prohibited — prohibition has well-documented harms of its own — but it does mean that the public finance case for gambling as a net fiscal positive is substantially weaker than industry advocates typically claim.
💡 For policy researchers: The K 918M social cost estimate compares to K 284M in government revenue, a ratio of 3.2:1. Even applying the most conservative assumptions and reducing the social cost estimate by 50%, social costs still exceed tax revenue by 60%. This ratio should inform how gambling taxation and harm reduction funding are calibrated in PNG's regulatory framework.
Help, Support & Responsible Gambling Resources
If you are concerned about your gambling or someone else's, please reach out. Help is free, confidential, and available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. You do not need to be in crisis to call — support is available at every stage.
National Problem Gambling Helpline (PNG):
📞 1800 611 — Free Call, 24/7Crisis text support: SMS "HELP" to 4116. Online chat available at problemgambling.org.pg
National Helpline
Free, confidential gambling support. Available 24/7. Counsellors speak Tok Pisin and English.
Call 1800 611Self-Exclusion Register
Voluntarily exclude yourself from all licensed venues and PNG-licensed online platforms. Free to register.
Register OnlineFinancial Counselling
Free financial counselling for gambling-affected individuals and families through NCPG-accredited services.
Call 1800 611Family Support
Gambling harm affects families, not just individuals. Dedicated support for partners, children, and carers.
Family ResourcesOnline CBT Program
Free, evidence-based online Cognitive Behavioural Therapy program developed specifically for PNG users.
Start Free ProgramBudget Planner Tool
Free interactive budget planner to understand your financial position and set spending boundaries.
Open PlannerSafer Gambling Tools Available to PNG Players
All PNG Gaming Commission-licensed operators are required to offer the following responsible gambling tools under the 2022 Online Gaming Regulations. If a licensed platform does not offer these tools, report it to the Gaming Commission.
| Tool | Description | Required Under PNG Law? |
|---|---|---|
| Deposit limits | Set daily, weekly or monthly maximum deposits. Reductions take effect immediately; increases require 24-hour cooling off. | ✅ Mandatory |
| Loss limits | Cap the amount you can lose per session or per day. | ✅ Mandatory |
| Time limits / session reminders | Set maximum session duration. Receive pop-up notifications at intervals. | ✅ Mandatory |
| Self-exclusion (platform level) | Exclude yourself from a specific licensed operator for a defined period (minimum 6 months, up to lifetime). | ✅ Mandatory |
| Multi-venue exclusion | Exclude from all PNG Gaming Commission-licensed operators simultaneously via the central register. | ✅ Mandatory |
| Reality check notifications | Receive reminders showing how long you have been playing and your net win/loss for the session. | ⚠️ Recommended |
| Pre-commitment systems | Set a budget before commencing a gambling session, with hard stop when budget reached. | ⚠️ Recommended |
Methodology & Data Sources
This study represents original analysis combining multiple primary and secondary data sources. We describe our methodology transparently so that other researchers, journalists, and policymakers can replicate, critique, or build upon our work.
Government Revenue Data
PNG Gaming Commission Annual Reports 2023, 2024, and Q1–Q4 2026. Internal Revenue Commission of PNG 2026 Tax Statistics Release. Bank of Papua New Guinea financial system data.
Prevalence Survey Data
NCPG Papua New Guinea Prevalence Survey 2024 (n=4,800 adults, stratified multi-stage cluster sample). PGSI validated instrument. Data weighted to NSO 2026 population estimates.
Household Expenditure Data
NSO Household Income and Expenditure Survey 2024 (n=12,400 households nationally). Gambling expenditure estimated from weekly diary records and recall questions.
Offshore Platform Estimation
Offshore unlicensed platform expenditure estimated using GRAP Pacific regional offshore penetration coefficients applied to PNG internet user and smartphone population data. This represents the highest uncertainty area in our model (±35%).
Social Cost Modelling
UPNG Department of Economics Working Paper #18 (2026) methodology, adapted from Productivity Commission (Australia) 2010 framework. Unit costs updated to 2026 prices using Port Moresby CPI data.
Limitations
Gambling expenditure is structurally under-reported in surveys. Offshore unlicensed platform estimates carry significant uncertainty. Social cost estimates are inherently contestable. All estimates should be treated as indicative rather than precise.
Sources & References
- PNG Gaming Commission (2026). Annual Report 2024–2026: Revenue, Licensing and Compliance Statistics. Port Moresby: PNG Gaming Commission.
- National Centre for Problem Gambling — Papua New Guinea (2024). Prevalence of Problem Gambling in PNG: 2024 National Survey. Port Moresby: NCPG.
- National Statistical Office PNG (2024). Household Income and Expenditure Survey 2024. Port Moresby: NSO. Available from nso.gov.pg
- University of Papua New Guinea, Department of Economics (2026). Working Paper #18: Estimating the Social Cost of Gambling in Papua New Guinea. Waigani: UPNG Press.
- Internal Revenue Commission of Papua New Guinea (2026). 2026 Tax Revenue Statistics: Gambling and Entertainment Duties. Port Moresby: IRC.
- Gambling Research Australia Pacific (GRAP) (2024). Pacific Region Online Gambling Market Analysis 2024. Sydney: GRAP.
- UPNG Department of Psychiatry (2024). Co-morbidity in Gambling Disorder: Findings from PNG Treatment Services. Waigani: UPNG.
- World Health Organization (2023). ICD-11 Diagnostic Criteria for Gambling Disorder. Geneva: WHO. Available from who.int
- Productivity Commission Australia (2010). Gambling: Productivity Commission Inquiry Report. Canberra: PC. (Methodology reference for social cost modelling.)
- Bank of Papua New Guinea (2026). Financial System Review Q4 2026. Port Moresby: BPNG.
- Loto PNG Limited (2026). Operational and Financial Summary 2026. Port Moresby: Loto PNG.
- PNG National Department of Health (2026). Mental Health Service Utilisation Data 2024. Port Moresby: NDoH.